Legal Opinion

Gaines v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1916No. Docket No. 67PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Gilday, J., presiding. Case by Clarence D. Gaines against the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada and others for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

While employed as a car repairer in defendant’s repair yards at Durand, Mich., plaintiff was injured as the result of striking the plunger of a defective drawbar with his hammer and thus releasing the compressed spring at its base, which threw the plunger, or other interior parts upon which the spring acted, violently out of the end of the drawbar in front of which he stood, and against him. On a former trial it was shown that the drawbar was part of a foreign car which came under defendant’s control while engaged in interstate commerce, and was then being repaired in compliance with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Ragon v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Gaines v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Nowakowski v. Detroit Stove WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. P. F. Collier & Son Co. v. HartfeilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  2. Kane Boiler Works, Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API