Legal Opinion
Paly v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 5, 1954No. 6587PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
This suit against the Government to recover damages for personal injuries is based on the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A., particularly sections 1346, 2671, 2674. The plaintiff, Harry Paly, was seriously injured on a Maryland highway in a collision between his Studebaker passenger automobile and a Dodge passenger automobile driven by David Stefan. The latter was an enlisted member of the^ United States Naval Forces stationed at the Patuxent River Base in Maryland, and had been ordered to act as a military escort for the body of another enlisted man who had…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Khoury v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- United States v. EleazerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- East Coast Freight Lines, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- United States v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cooner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Dhanraj v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Jones v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- L.M.T. Steel Products, Inc. v. PeirsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Purcell v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.