Legal Opinion

Lyons v. Barnett

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1922No. Appeal, No. 94PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keiler, J.,

On the trial of an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, in an action arising from contract, the court below refused to allow the defendant to give evidence of a claim of set-off amounting to $291.56, on the ground that section 7 of the Act of March 20, 1810, 5 Sm. L. 161, limited the amount of a set-off which could be presented before a justice to the sum of $100, and on appeal to the common pleas the same limitation attached.

The right to defalcate or set off accounts, etc., in actions brought in any court in this State was secured by the Act of January 12,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Deihm v. SnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Gunnis, Barritt & Co. v. CluffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Backer v. RemovSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Tate v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  5. Herring v. AdamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bauman v. BittnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Alschuler Weisz v. LipkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Weiner v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Leonard v. Rucci, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1958
  5. Pennsylvania Supply Co. v. Silver, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API