Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Edmonds v. Edmonds

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 21, 1983No. 82-2501Published

1ConcurrenceAnstead, Chief Judge

I concur in the affirmance of the trial court’s awards of lump sum and rehabilitative alimony. It appears to me that such awards now occupy a status similar to that of damage awards in other legal settings where there are claims that the awards are inadequate or excessive. Of course, the guidelines for making alimony awards are somewhat more precise than the guidelines utilized, for example, to determine damages in a personal injury case. Nevertheless, it is apparent that the degree of discretion now vested in a trial judge is substantial, and, just as a damage award will not be disturbed as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Conner v. ConnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. Lopez v. LopezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. School Bd. of Palm Beach County v. TaylorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Sanders v. SandersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API