Larson v. Kleist Builders, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtSchudson, J.
Firstar Bank Milwaukee, N.A., appeals from a judgment granted in favor of Alan and Laurie Larson arising from Firstar's deposit of their check, payable to Firstar, into the general account of Kleist Builders, Ltd., rather than into the intended escrow account. The trial court concluded that Kleist, the Larsons' contractor, was not a fiduciary and, therefore, rejected Firstar's claim that the Uniform Fiduciary Act operated as a defense to the Larsons' action. We affirm.
The facts are undisputed. In June 1994, the Lar-sons entered into a home remodeling contract with Kleist. Kleist requested…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Jungbluth v. Hometown, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. Hunzinger Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Johnson v. Citizens National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Badger III Limited Partnership v. Howard, Needles, Tammen & BergendoffCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Springfield Township v. Mellon PSFS BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Springfield Township v. Mellon PSFS BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Springfield Township v. Mellon PSFS BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005