Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Hammer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 23, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Feely, S.

On' the judicial settlement of this estate a preliminary question was presented as to whether or not the claim hereinafter mentioned was barred by lapse of time. The facts are not disputed. On September 19, 1936, testator as maker signed two (unindorsed) promissory notes, each for $250 and interest, payable four months from date, which by the payee’s •endorsements passed to the present holder and owner, the Union Banking & Trust Co. of Dubois, Pa. Testator never paid any part of said obligations; nor is there any writing shown either acknowledging the debt, or making any new promise…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ulster County Savings Institution v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. In Re the Accounting of SchorerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Diehl v. . BeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. In re the Estate of SchorerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  5. In re the Estate of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CudahyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966
  2. In re the Accounting of Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API