Legal Opinion

Hejazi v. Eugene Municipal Court

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 2021No. A175373PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

622 Submitted August 6, affirmed September 15, 2021 HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EUGENE MUNICIPAL COURT and City of Eugene, Defendants. Lane County Circuit Court 21AD0013; A175373

495 P3d 753

R. Curtis Conover, Judge. Hamid Michael Hejazi filed the brief pro se. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Cite as

314 Or App 622

(2021) 623 PER CURIAM As allowed under ORS 19.205(2), and explained in Stanwood v. Multnomah County, 135 Or App 58, 60,

898 P2d 196

(1995), plaintiff appeals an order denying his request for a waiver or deferral…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stanwood v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Smith v. Dept. of Corrections (A170818)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Hejazi v. Eugene Police Dept. (A175344)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hejazi v. Eugene Police Dept. (A175344)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API