Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Allen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 2, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion to open default. Before Judge Littlejohn. Sumter superior court. May term, 1899.

1Opinion of the Court

T Lewis, j.

1. There was no abuse of discretion in denying, at the trial term of an action, a motion by the defendant to open a default, the-recitals of fact set forth in the motion not disclosing any satisfactory reason for failing to answer at the proper time.

2. When, by reason of the defendant’s failure to file an answer, the averments of the plaintiffs’ petition are properly taken as true, and the court thereupon directs a verdict in the latter’s favor, the judgment will not be reversed, when the only exception to this action by the court is that the plaintiffs should have been required to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boaz v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pape v. Woolford Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Jackson v. GrantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Tower v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Glennville Investment Co. v. Jordan & RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Hayes v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API