Legal Opinion
Heavens v. KING CTY. RURAL LIBR. DIST.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1965No. 37395PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
66 Wn.2d 558 (1965)
404 P.2d 453
CYRIL HEAVENS et al., Appellants,
v.
KING COUNTY RURAL LIBRARY DISTRICT et al., Respondents.[*]
No. 37395.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
July 8, 1965.
Schweppe, Reiter, Doolittle & Krug, by Mary Ellen Krug, for appellants.
Charles O. Carroll and Jennings P. Felix, for respondents.
The Attorney General and Jane Dowdle Smith, Assistant, amicus curiae.
WEAVER, J.
Fundamentally, this action, commenced under our Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act (RCW 7.24), challenges the constitutionality[1] of Laws of 1961, chapter 162, which authorizes local improvement…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- In Re SchmitzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Newby v. Platte CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
- Wilson v. LambertSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ray E. And Laurie Gabelein, Respondent's v. Diking District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014