Legal Opinion

United States v. Lawrenson

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 25, 1962No. Crim. 24975PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

Lawrenson has now filed several new motions, namely: (1) a second motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, in which he seeks to remedy the weakness of a former motion for a new trial, which was denied by this court, with the denial affirmed on appeal; (2) a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate and set aside the judgment and sentence, which raises a number 1 of points, most of which are similar to the points included in his former motion to vacate and correct the sentence; (3) a motion for leave to examine the grand jury records and for other…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Charles E. LawrensonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  2. Crouse v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Bell v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1966
  4. United States v. Charles Edward LawrensonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  5. Spears v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API