Legal Opinion

People v. Chambers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1987PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Carro, J.

While we reject defendant’s argument that the circumstantial evidence against him was insufficient to prove his guilt of murder in the second degree and other related crimes beyond a reasonable doubt, we do agree that he was deprived of a fair trial when the trial court admitted into evidence the double hearsay statement of the deceased that defendant told her he intended to visit her at her apartment at a particular time on the very day she was killed. In view of the fact that the prosecutor relied on this hearsay statement to place defendant at the scene of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. MaliziaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. People v. KimesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. People v. SlaughterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Coy v. RenicoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API