Hart v. Naumburg
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial.department, entered upon an order made December 21, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial: The following is the opinion in full: “ The defendants are wholesale clothing merchants in the city of New York, and in the large building which they occupied there were three elevators, one for passengers,…
Read the full summary
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial.department, entered upon an order made December 21, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial: The following is the opinion in full: “ The defendants are wholesale clothing merchants in the city of New York, and in the large building which they occupied there were three elevators, one for passengers, one for both passengers and freight and the other, the one in question, an Otis platform sidewalk freight elevator. On the…
1Opinion of the Court
O’Brien, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial. .
All concur, except Ruger, Ch. J., not voting.
Judgment reversed.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Grifhahn v. KreizerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Smith v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Starer v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Hubener v. HeideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Ingram v. FosburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.