Legal Opinion

McFeeters v. Cecil

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 15, 1936No. 26001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an action commenced by plaintiff in error upon a claim presented to and disallowed by defendant as administrator of the estate of A. M. Cecil, deceased.

The claim sued upon was:

“To services rendered in caring for Mrs. A. M. Cecil from October 27, 1912, to January 1, 1925, (a) $100.00, per year_$1,232.00
“And from January 1, 1925, to January 1, 1932, (a) $250.00 per .year - 1,750.00
“Total_$2,982.00”

The claim was in proper form and was presented to the administrator in due time.

Trial was had to a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $750.

Motion for a new…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Miller v. . LashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Morrissey v. FaucettWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Freeman v. FreemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Grisham v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mosley v. MosleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Israel v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API