Legal Opinion

Sluis v. Betty W.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1972No. 31136PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KANE, J.

Defendant Betty W. appeals from the trial court’s. judgment freeing her four minor children from parental custody and control pursuant to Civil Code, section 232, subdivision (g).

These proceedings were initiated by Mary Ellen Vander Sluis, a child welfare worker in the Public Welfare Department of Napa County, who petitioned the Napa County Superior Court to declare appellant’s four minor children free from parental custody and control under section 232, subdivisions (a), (b), (c) and (g). Appellant, represented by counsel and claiming various defects in .the petition, filed a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Bilyeu v. State Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Dribin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Department of Social Services v. Ronald P.California Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Detrich v. Carolyn B.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re BeverlySupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  4. In Re Marriage of CarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re Laura F.California Supreme Court · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API