Ramos v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YATES, Justice.
Appellant, Armando Miranda Ramos, appeals the trial court’s decision to revoke his probation. In one point of error, appellant contends the trial court failed to admonish him as to the proper punishment range as required by Article 26.13 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. We affirm.
Pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant entered a plea of guilty to possession of less than twenty-eight grams of a controlled substance, which is a second degree felony. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115 (Vernon 1992). 1 The trial court deferred adjudication and placed appellant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lyon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Tillman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Singleton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999
- Moss v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Boccard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- David M. Kurtzemann v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.