Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Cox
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 18, 1968No. 66 Civ. 4487PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLEAN, District Judge.
The three plaintiffs in this action are nationals and residents of Rumania. They sue “on behalf of themselves and all other residents of Romania, similarly situated” for a judgment declaring that Section 2218 of the New York Surrogate’s Court Procedure Act, formerly Section 269-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act, is unconstitutional. * They also seek an injunction restraining five New York Surrogates and the Comptroller of the State of New York from enforcing and applying it.
The prior history of this action may be briefly stated. In the spring of 1967 plaintiffs moved for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Zschernig v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Clark v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Thrifty Shoppers Scrip Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In re the Accounting of GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goldstein v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shames v. State of NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
- Bjarsch v. DiFalcoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Opusunju v. GiulianiNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- Goldstein v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.