Legal Opinion

Beaver's Administrator v. Proctor Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 19, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Whitley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

This is the second appeal of this case. The opinion on the former appeal may be found in 151 Ky., page 839, under the title of Proctor Coal Company v. Beaver’s Administrator. It was there held that it was Beaver’s duty to prop his room, and failing to do so, he violated the law. It was further adjudged that his own negli*579gence was the proximate and direct canse of his injury, and that for that reason a peremptory instruction should have been given. However, in remanding the case, the court used the following language:

“It is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Gossett v. Kentucky Wagon Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Straight Creek Coal Co. v. Huddleston's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graziani v. AmbroseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MinkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Kirchdorfer v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API