Legal Opinion

Betts v. Village of Reading

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Hillsdale. (Lane, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMobse, C. J.

Section 7, chap. 5, of the charter of the village of Reading provides that—

“ The common council shall have power to grant licenses to authorize persons to exercise the business of tavern-keeper, inn-holder, common victualer, or saloon-keeper, within said village, and may impose such fees, to be paid into the village treasury on the granting of such license, as they may see fit; Provided, that no license shall be granted for the sale of spirituous liquors or intoxicating drinks.”

The common council adopted, to take effect May 1, 1879, an ordinance as- follows:

*78. “ An ordinance relative to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. WatkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Cribbs v. SowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beachlawn Building Corp. v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Kronmeyer v. BuckIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Beath v. ChapotonMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Eslow v. City of AlbionMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Baldwin v. Village of ChesaningMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API