Legal Opinion

Cribbs v. Sowle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Berrien. (O’Hara, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action of assumpsit upon the ■common counts commenced in justice’s court. On appeal to the circuit court for the county of Berrien, the circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendant.

The case made by the plaintiff was substantially as follows: He is a farmer about 72 years of age, and has lived in Bainbridge, in Berrien county, upon his present farm, for nearly 40 years. There is an orchard on his premises, and he makes and sells cider. He had cider in his cellar in the spring of 1889. The defendant had a mill not far from plaintiff’s, and teamsters in his employ-drawing logs…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eadie v. . SlimmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Town Council of Cahaba v. BurnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  3. Taylor v. JaquesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Meech v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Schultz v. CatlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Galusha v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Beachlawn Building Corp. v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gray v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Weiser v. WelchMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Baldwin v. HutchisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API