Legal Opinion

Grossman Industrial Properties, Inc. v. Colley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 7, 1969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This action of contract was referred to an auditor whose findings were not to be final. After the report was filed the case was heard solely on the report. The plaintiff moved for judgment on the report and the motion was allowed. The defendant appealed.

The defendant’s appeal, which is under G. L. c. 231, § 96, is not properly here. Section 96 brings “to this court for review errors of law alleged to have been committed by *579the Superior Court in civil actions or proceedings at law in only three instances: First, where an order has been entered sustaining or overruling a demurrer on the ground…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Merrimac Chemical Co. v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Harrington v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Ballou v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Pheeney v. Malden Coal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Plastileather Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API