United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement in the action commenced by the plaintiff United States of America (the “Government”) against the defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “IBT” or “Union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board (the “GEB”) embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (the “Consent Decree”). The Consent Decree provides for three Court-appointed officials: the Independent Administrator to oversee the Consent Decree’s remedial provisions, the Investigations Officer to bring charges…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.