Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Schirmer v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1927No. 20570. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in the following part of the memorandum opinion of the trial court:

“In this matter there is offered first the alleged will of the deceased dated February 28,1926, executed in the presence of George M. Nethercutt and C. E. Schirmer, as attesting witnesses, and an alleged codicil to said will, but separated and detached therefrom, dated October 1,1926, and appearing to be signed by the deceased in the presence of George M. Nethercutt and C. E. Schirmer as attesting witnesses, being the same attest ing witnesses subscribing as such to tbe said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Benrud v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Klein v. FraserMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Sears v. DillinghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  4. Swanzy v. KolbMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Kaufman v. MurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schirmer v. NethercuttWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Caesar v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. Moos v. First State Bank of UvaldeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. In Re the Estate of WhittierWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. In Re Wiltzius'estateWashington Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API