Trevino v. Gates
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
LETTS, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiff Johanna Trevino’s motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, which came for hearing regularly on March 20, 1995. This case, juxtaposed with two previous cases in which the Court awarded attorney’s fees to the same counsel, Gomez v. Gates, 804 F.Supp. 69 (C.D.Cal.1992), and Gillen v. Gates, 847 F.Supp. 1475 (C.D.Cal.1994), aff'd, 56 F.3d 71 (9th Cir. June 1, 1995) (Table), illustrates once again the difficulty of arriving at a “reasonable” attorney’s fee in § 1988…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Price v. KramerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997