Legal Opinion

Price v. Kramer

District Court, C.D. California

Decided December 19, 1997No. CV 94-6506 JSLPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1296OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES

LETTS, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of plaintiffs Lohren Price, et al., for award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 1988, which came for hearing regularly on September 15, 1997.

This court has previously detailed the difficulty faced by a trial court judge when applying the law of both the United States Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit with respect to attorney’s fee awards pursuant to the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Award Act of Í976. See Trevino v. Gates, 888 F.Supp. 1509, 1513-16…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Trevino v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Uherek v. Houston Lighting and Power Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
  2. Briceno v. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  3. Carter v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  4. Springs v. RaberDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API