Ryan Harvey, Rocks Off, Inc. v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah
Utah Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceJustice Himonas
*428¶82 I concur in Justice Durham's opinion without reservation. I write separately to more fully explain why, in my view, the tribe is not a necessary party under rule 19(a) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure and to offer some practical guidance to the district courts on how to manage a dual-capacity suit like this one. I also write separately to lay out why I believe the tribal exhaustion doctrine applies to state courts and why it is a rule of exhaustion and not abstention. Last, I write separately to identify a jurisdictional issue the district court and the parties should take up on…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.