Higgs v. New York Central Rd
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By CARPENTER, J.
The evidence in this ease consisted of the testimony of the plaintiff alone. The defendant made appropriate motions for a" directed verdict which were overruled. Looking to the evidence record, we find the following facts:
Just after one o’clock P. M. September 17, 1935, a clear day, the plaintiff, driving a Ford coach type automobile sought to cross from north to south the tracks of the defendant on Shoop Street in the village of Wauseon. To the north of the first track' of the defendant and parallel with and about fifteen or twenty feet from it is the single track of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cleveland Ry. Co. v. MastersonOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Cleveland Ry. Co. v. WendtOhio Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by1 opinion
- Huerta v. Van ClevePaulding County Court of Common Pleas · 1985