Legal Opinion

Huerta v. Van Cleve

Paulding County Court of Common Pleas

Decided October 4, 1985No. CI-85-027Published

1Opinion of the CourtHitchcock, J.

Plaintiff requests summary judgment finding defendant Clay Etta Van Cleve liable for personal injury caused by her negligence in respect to an auto-motorcycle collision in this county. From the pleadings and depositions on file it appears that there .is no dispute as to these facts.

On June 9,1984, shortly before 1:00 p.m., Clay Etta was, with permission, driving the 1971 Oldsmobile owned by her husband, defendant Jerry L. Van Cleve, on State Route 111. She was going west and approaching the location where S.R. Ill intersects at right angles State Route 637. At this point traffic on S.R. 637…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. MastersonOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Farmer v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Higgs v. New York Central RdOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Pflugh v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API