Legal Opinion
Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. Sussex County
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 27, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-144-RRM, 92-289-RRM and 92-513-RRMPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKELVIE, District Judge.
This is a contract case. The parties are Sussex County, Delaware (“the County”) and several of its comprehensive general liability insurers, Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company (“Harleysville”), Maryland Casualty Company and its subsidiary Northern Insurance Company of New York (collectively “Maryland Casualty”), and the Home Insurance Company and the Home Indemnity Company (collectively “The Home”).
In 1984, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) detected the presence of volatile organic compounds at the County’s Landfill No. 5. Thereafter,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Technicon Electronics Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hazen Paper Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- B.F. Goodrich Co. v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Admiral InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1995
- South MacOmb Disposal Authority v. American InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.