Legal Opinion

Tabac v. Kinney

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 27, 1987No. 86 C 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.

This case arises under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The jurisdiction of this court is based on ERISA, § 502(e)(1). Plaintiff George Tabac and defendants John Kinney, Air Distributors Associates, Inc., and Air Distributors Associates, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (“the Plan”), have filed cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is granted and defendants’ motion is denied.

FACTS

The material faets in this ease are not in dispute. In July, 1985,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. George Wolfe v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Dennard v. Richards Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Struble v. New Jersey Brewery Employees' Welfare Trust FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Farmers & Mechanics Life Ass'n v. CaineIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API