Legal Opinion

Hamilton Gas Co. v. Inland Gas Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1939No. Nos. 7530, 7669, 7531, 7670PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

Both appellants are gas producing companies operating in Kentucky. The ap-pellee is a pipe, line company in receivership superseded by reorganization proceedings under § 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207. The controversies grow out of contracts entered into in. 1927 whereby the debtor undertook to .construct a pipe line from the vicinity of leaseholds belonging to appellants in Kentucky, to Ashland, and agreed to purchase from appellants certain minimum quantities of gas to be delivered into its pipe line at progressive contract rates. The appeals are from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Express Co. v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Baker v. Central Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  3. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co. v. Central Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  4. Des Moines and Fort Dodge Railroad Co. v. Wabash, St. Louis and Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. North Kansas City Bridge & R. v. LenessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Inland Gas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. In Re Inland Gas CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1947
  3. In the Matters of Inland Gas Corporation, Kentucky Fuel Gas Corporation, American Fuel & Power Company, DebtorsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  4. In re Inland Gas Corp.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1961
  5. In the Matters of Inland Gas Corporation, Kentucky Fuel Gas Corporation, American Fuel & Power Company, DebtorsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API