Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Birgfeld
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 16, 1948No. [No. 57, October Term, 1947.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.
This action of assumpsit was brought by Louis M. Jackson and Fannie L. Jackson, his wife, lessors, against H. William Birgfeld, Jr., and Douglas Birgfeld, lessees, to recover $1,200 for the rent for a cannery building and its equipment in Bethesda.
The lease demises “premises No. 4717 Miller Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland, consisting of a one-story building and including all equipment therein contained,” for the term of five years from May 1, 1946, to April 30, 1951, for the sum of $36,000, payable in monthly installments of $600 each. The lease gives lessees the right to renew the lease for an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sheets v. Selden's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Hayner v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Smith v. McEnanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Kuschinsky v. FlaniganMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Jacobs Concessions, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Goff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Evans v. Shiloh Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Telesca v. M. L. Bruenn Co.New Rochelle City Court · 1972
- Maiatico v. StevensDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- (2001), Maryland Attorney General Reports2001