Legal Opinion

Hollowell v. Simonson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1863PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

A suit was instituted by the State, on relation of the Auditor, against Larue and wife, mortgagors of certain property to a trust fund. Junior incumbrancers were made defendants, to-wit: Hollowell, Haines, and Roberts, each of whom had judgments rendered in 1858 and 1859, against one M. V. Simonson, in whose wife, Catharine, the title, by deed dated in 1852, appeared to rest, as the remote grantee of said Larue.

There was no controversy about the right of the plaintiff to recover; nor is there any question made herein that behalf.

The question is, who shall have the overplus after the paymeut…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCann v. LetcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  2. Hunt's adm'r v. DupuyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1850

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McNutt v. McNuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Leach v. RainsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Jarboe v. SeverinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Brown v. RawlingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Howlett v. DiltsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API