Legal Opinion

Custren v. Curtis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1990No. 02349PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Edward Custren appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his complaint upon appellee’s preliminary objections. The trial court dismissed the action because the named defendant was dead at the time the action was brought. Appellant argues the trial court erred in dismissing the action because the appellee waived the defect in the complaint. We find that such a defect cannot be waived; consequently, we affirm.

This action arose from an incident on July 29, 1985. Appellant, a mailman, was delivering mail to appellee when he fell and injured himself. Appellant’s attorney engaged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. PeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Zarlinsky v. LaudenslagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Ehrhardt v. CostelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Valentin v. CartegenaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Longo v. EstepSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gojmerac v. NaughtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Galarza-Padron, M. v. Kirkaldie, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Guzy v. Iwanowski, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1993
  4. Kelleh v. Leuthy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2013
  5. Security National Bank v. Catlin Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API