Legal Opinion

Constitutional Law State's Attorneys And Sheriffs – Whether Officers are Entitled to Receive Automatic Salary Increases During Their Terms When Those Increases Are Set in Advance Before the Term – Whether it Would Be An Unconstitutional Reduction in Salary to Rescind An Automatic Salary Increase that Was Set Before the Term

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided June 28, 2019No. 104OAG041Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gen. 41] 41 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW STATE’S ATTORNEYS AND SHERIFFS – WHETHER OFFICERS ARE ENTITLED TO RECEIVE AUTOMATIC SALARY INCREASES DURING THEIR TERMS WHEN THOSE INCREASES ARE SET IN ADVANCE BEFORE THE TERM – WHETHER IT WOULD BE AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL REDUCTION IN SALARY TO RESCIND AN AUTOMATIC SALARY INCREASE THAT WAS SET BEFORE THE TERM June 28, 2019 James J. Moran, President County Commissioners of Queen Anne’s County You have requested our opinion on two related questions regarding the salaries of the State’s Attorney and the Sheriff for Queen Anne’s County. First, you ask whether those…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. County Commissioners v. MonnettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  5. Stiftel v. MalarkeySupreme Court of Delaware · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API