Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Big Apple Supermarket of Columbus, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 16, 1962No. 39590PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Feankum, Judge.

All of the special grounds of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial present essentially the same question, viz., whether or not the court erred in instructing the jury with respect to the principles of law concerning “accident.” The plaintiff insists that neither the pleadings nor the evidence authorized a charge concerning accident.

Code § 102-103 defines accident as “an event that takes place without one’s foresight or expectation; that which takes place or begins to exist without design.” See Southern R. Co. v. Hill, 125 Ga. 354 (54 SE 113). It is sometimes expressed as an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  3. Morrow v. Southeastern Stages Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  4. Savannah Electric Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Stansfield v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ware v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Whitehead v. SeymourCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Cohran v. Douglasville Concrete Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Delk v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API