Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Lintz

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1979No. B-7745PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

The question presented is whether the cause of action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations contained in article 581-33 C, the Securities Act. 1 Melvin Lintz instituted this suit against Eastman Dillon, Únion Securities & Co., and Sam Dodd seeking a rescission of a contract for the sale of Omnitec securities. Trial to the court resulted in a judgment that Lintz take nothing. The court of civil appeals, by a divided court, reversed and rendered judgment for Lintz. 568 S.W.2d 147. We reverse the judgment of the court of civil appeals and affirm the judgment of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hohenberg Bros. Co. v. George E. Gibbons & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lintz v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of America v. Webster, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  2. Weisz v. Spindletop Oil and Gas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  3. Mar-Len of Louisiana, Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1990
  4. Block 316 Garage, Ltd. v. Wortham & Van Liew, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  5. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Brainard, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API