Dillon v. Lintz
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
The question presented is whether the cause of action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations contained in article 581-33 C, the Securities Act. 1 Melvin Lintz instituted this suit against Eastman Dillon, Únion Securities & Co., and Sam Dodd seeking a rescission of a contract for the sale of Omnitec securities. Trial to the court resulted in a judgment that Lintz take nothing. The court of civil appeals, by a divided court, reversed and rendered judgment for Lintz. 568 S.W.2d 147. We reverse the judgment of the court of civil appeals and affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hohenberg Bros. Co. v. George E. Gibbons & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
- Lintz v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
3Cited by21 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of America v. Webster, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Weisz v. Spindletop Oil and Gas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
- Mar-Len of Louisiana, Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1990
- Block 316 Garage, Ltd. v. Wortham & Van Liew, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Brainard, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.