Legal Opinion

Lintz v. Dillon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1978No. 8084PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIES, Chief Justice.

Melvin Lintz sued Eastman Dillon, Union Securities & Co., and Sam Dodd for recission of a contract for the sale of Omnitec securities by Eastman Dillon to Lintz. Plaintiff sought recission on the basis of Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 581-33 A(l) for failure to register the securities, or on the basis of art. 581-33 A(2) because of untrue statements or omissions of material fact *149made at the time of the sale.1 Trial was to the court without a jury.

The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law that: (1) any cause of action based on art. 581-33 A(l) for failure to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Barfield v. Howard M. Smith Company of AmarilloTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. O'NEIL v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Flowers v. Dempsey-Tegeler & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LintzTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. 3-C Oil Co. v. Modesta PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. 3-C Oil Co. v. Modesta PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Lintz v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API