Legal Opinion

Cargill v. Greater Salem Baptist Church

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 14, 2006No. 2005-CA-001110-MRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GUIDUGLI, Judge.

Pat Cargill (Cargill) and Sherman Arthur (Arthur) appeal from an order of the Jefferson Circuit Court granting the Ap-pellees’ 1 motion for summary judgment. Cargill and Arthur contend that the circuit court incorrectly determined that the Ap- pellees’ oral and written statements were not actionable as defamatory. Having concluded that the circuit court properly granted summary judgment, we affirm.

Cargill and Arthur are former members of Greater Salem Baptist Church (Greater Salem), which is a Congregationalist church founded under the National Baptist Convention in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Presbyterian Church in US v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Scifres v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1996
  5. Paintsville Hospital Co. v. RoseKentucky Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Toler v. Süd-Chemie, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  2. LaVonne Pfeil, Individually and as Trustee for Heirs of Henry Pfeil v. St. Matthews Evangelical Lutheran Church of the Unaltered Augsburg Confession of Worthington, Nobles County, MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. Leeds v. CITY OF MULDRAUGHCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
  4. Aaron Hieneman, Individually v. Patricia Hieneman WootenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024
  5. Butrum v. Louisville Metropolitan GovernmentDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API