Parks v. Fuller

Carlisle, Judge,

It is contended by the plaintiff in error that the allegations of count 2 of the petition and specifically of paragraph 10 and paragraph 22 thereof brought the case, insofar as that count is concerned, within the rules announced in such cases as Bailey v. Murray, 88 Ga. App. 491 (77 S. E. 2d 103), and Southern Gas Corp. v. Cowan, 89 Ga. App. 810 (81 S. E. 2d 488), and Harris v. Price, 95 Ga. App. 521, 523 (98 S. E. 2d 118), in which cases it was held in effect that where an employer furnishes an employee an automobile for the employee’s use in performing a part or all of his…