Legal Opinion

Diepeveen v. Larry Vogt, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 10, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

27 N.J. Super. 254 (1953)

99 A.2d 329

NEAL DIEPEVEEN, T/A NEAL BULB CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

LARRY VOGT, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 9, 1953.

Decided September 10, 1953.

Before Judges CLAPP, GOLDMANN and EWART.

Mr. Charles W. Symanski argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Robert W. MacQuestein, on the brief).

Mr. Samuel J. Davidson argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Alfred Gliedt, attorney; Mr. Otto Venino, Jr., of counsel; Mr. Nelson H. Tegrarian, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by EWART, J.A.D.

Pl…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edgar v. Joseph Breck & Sons Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. E. P. Moorhead v. Minneapolis Seed Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Davis v. Ferguson Seed FarmsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Ward v. ValkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Ingraham v. Associated Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zabriskie Chevrolet, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. McConnell v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  3. India Paint and Lacquer Co. v. United Steel Prod. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Adams v. Peter Tramontin Motor SalesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. St. George v. GrisafeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API