Legal Opinion

Ingraham v. Associated Oil Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1932No. 23320. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

The respondents, Ingraham and wife, own a fruit ranch near the town of Zillah, in Yakima county, and brought this action to recover damages which they claim they sustained as a result of spraying their peach orchard with “Avon Spray Emulsion,” an oil spray manufactured and produced by the appellant Associated Oil Company. They alleged in their complaint: That, at the time the appellants sold the oil spray, each of them expressly and impliedly warranted and guaranteed that the spray was suitable for the purposes for which it was intended, namely, to kill aphis pests on fruit trees, but that it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Godair v. Ham National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Moore v. Stetson Machine WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. McNeer v. NorfleetMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Beeler v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Celanese Corp. Of America v. John Clark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  2. India Paint and Lacquer Co. v. United Steel Prod. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Passovoy v. Nordstrom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. Ershig Sheet Metal, Inc. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. L. Romano Engineering Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API