Legal Opinion

Vishnevsky v. Glassberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 9, 2006PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

, In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J), dated October 29, 2004, which granted re-argument, vacated its prior order dated February 20, 2004, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiffs Nadia Vishnevsky and Mustafa Huseinovic did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and denied the defendant’s motion.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof, upon…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Sainte-Aime v. HoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Grossman v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Porto v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Ferenczi v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Raleigh v. RamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Scotto v. SuhAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Burgos v. VargasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API