Legal Opinion
Scotto v. Suh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 22, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated May 1, 2007, as granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The defendant met his prima facie burden of establishing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Verette v. ZiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Patterson v. NY Alarm Response Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- D'Onofrio v. Floton, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sealy v. Riteway-1, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Silla v. MohammadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Conder v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Euvino v. RauchbauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kublo v. RzadkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010