Legal Opinion

Barger v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1991No. 49A02-9008-CR-488PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

ROBERTSON, Judge.

We reversed Barger's conviction of child molesting as a Class D felony holding that the State failed to present sufficient evidence of probative value on the essential element of the purported victim's age to establish Barger's conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. Barger v. State, (1991), Ind.App., 576 N.E.2d 621. The State has filed this petition for rehearing asserting that our decision is erroneous in four (4) respects. Since none of the State's assertions have merit, we deny the State's petition.

L

SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE

As its first allegation of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Gaddis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Mahla v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Vuncannon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Dixon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Barger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API