Dixon v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, Presiding Judge.
Donald B. Dixon was found guilty of attempted child molesting, a class C felony, as proscribed by Ind.Code 35 — 42—4r-3(c).1 On appeal Dixon challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction. He also argues the trial court erred in instructing the jury and in admitting evidence of uncharged crimes.
We affirm.
I. Sufficiency of the Evidence
When considering sufficiency challenges on appeal, we will not invade the province of the jury by weighing the evidence or judging witnesses’ credibility. Miller v. State, (1981) Ind., 417 N.E.2d 339; Goodpaster v.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Maldonado v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Zickefoose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Porter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Case v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Henry Tague v. Thomas Richards and Attorney General of the State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Potter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Hollowell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Kelly v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.