Legal Opinion

Spexarth v. Rhode Island Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

— This is a suit to reform, as for mutual mistake, an insurance policy issued by the defendant company to the plaintiff, insuring* his building in Astoria against loss by fire occurring at any time during the three-year period beginning June 25, 1921. The building was damaged by the great fire in Astoria on December 8, 1922.

The policy is admitted by the plaintiff to be correct according to the alleged actual contract between the parties except for the following stipulation, appearing in the policy really issued:

“Reduced Rate Average Clause. In consideration of the reduced rate at which, and…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schoonover v. SchoonoverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. POWERS ET UX. v. Coos Bay Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Manning Lumber Co. v. VogetOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Russell v. Shell Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. General Electric Supply Corp. v. Republic Construction Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API