Legal Opinion
McCroskey v. Gustafson
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 7, 1981No. 80SC109PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVIRA, Justice.
Petitioners are citizens and taxpayers of the City and County of Denver (City). They challenge the ruling of the court of appeals which held that they lacked standing to bring an action on behalf of the City. McCroskey v. Gustafson, Colo.App., 611 P.2d 984 (1980). We granted certiorari in order to consider the ruling of the court of appeals. We affirm.
Carl Gustafson and his employer, Quinn & Co., Inc. (respondents), were bond consultants for the City and advised the City on a number of bond issues from 1971 through 1974. In late 1975 Gustafson recognized that a favorable bond…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wimberly v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Dodge v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Silver v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Developmental Pathways v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- People v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Hickenlooper, Governor of Colorado v. Freedom from Religion Foundation, IncSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. City of Panama City BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.