Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Finnigan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 5, 1934No. 31,621PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

The petitioners, as the parents and natural guardians of their daughter, Jeconiah Tucker, now about eight years of age, brought this proceeding for her custody, alleging that such custody was wrongfully withheld from them by respondents. The trial court, after hearing the evidence, remanded custody of the child to respondents. The petitioners have appealed.

The facts, so far as it is necessary to state them, are as follows: Late in the year 1927 the petitioners permitted respondents to take the child, then about two years of age, into their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chapsky v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Gilmore v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Kailer v. KailerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. In re Melroy v. KeiserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Andrews v. LandonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McGuire v. McGuireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. McFall v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  3. Leach v. LeachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Windell v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Wilson v. Kansas Children's Home & Service LeagueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API