Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRANE, Judge.
This appeal involves the issue of whether a prior judgment dismissing the same cause of action with prejudice for failure to be represented by a licensed attorney precludes a subsequent action because of the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estop-pel. We hold that, where there was no adjudication on the merits in the prior action, the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel do not bar a subsequent action.
The litigation leading to this appeal involves Property Exchange & Sales, Inc.’s claim for a return of a security deposit from the defendants. After amendment,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barkley v. Carter County State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Denny v. MathieuSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Peoples-Home Life Ins. Co. v. HaakeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Delmain v. Meramec Valley R-III School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. BozarthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hoag v. McBride & Son Inv. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Berkowski v. St. Louis County Board of Election CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- H.R.B. v. J.L.G.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Howard v. YoungmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State Ex Rel. American Eagle Waste Industries v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.