Legal Opinion

State v. McNeill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1950PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The principal question for decision is whether the court prejudiced the defendant’s case by ordering his witness into custody in the presence of the jury without assigning any reason therefor.

It is freely conceded that the court may not impeach or disparage the testimony of a material witness for the defendant in a criminal prosecution. The authorities are to the effect that no judge at any time during the trial of a cause is permitted to east doubt upon the testimony of a *667witness or to impeach bis credibility. G.S. 1-180; S. v. Perry, ante, 467; S. v. Cantrell, 230 N.C. 46, 51 S.E. 2d 887;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Withers v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. State v. . DickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864
  3. State v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. State v. . OwenbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. State v. . RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. State v. MangumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API